Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo v2.6 Flash
Claude Opus 5.5 took 11 min 46 s and $1.57 at list price, MiMo v2.6 Flash took 24 min 20 s and $0.040 at list price. MiMo v2.6 Flash took 2.1× as long, and Claude Opus 5.5 cost 39× as much.
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · $20.00/M out · 2,737 HN pts
MiMo v2.6 Flash
Xiaomi · $0.28/M out · 5 HN pts
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has CLI runs here (Claude Code).
Pelican
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Watch
Draw a mechanical wristwatch that shows the current local time, with a sweeping seconds hand and a date window. Make it look expensive.
Landing
Build the landing page for Lumen Cycles, a Copenhagen workshop that builds custom cargo bikes to order. Make it look like a real brand you would trust with 4,000 euros.
Breakout
Make a Breakout game I can play right now with the keyboard or the mouse. Give it several levels, a score and some juice.
Logo
Design a logo for Night Heron, an independent bookshop that only opens after dark.
About
Write the opening of the About us page for Patchbay, a three-person studio in Rotterdam that repairs vintage synthesizers. About 150 words.
Patchbay is three people in a narrow workshop near the Maas in Rotterdam. Every day we open up instruments that were built before most of their current owners were born. Some arrive in flight cases and some come wrapped in old bath towels. Most have a story: a Juno that went quiet halfway through a gig, a Minimoog left in someone's attic for thirty years, or a modular system that a previous technician gave up on.
We started Patchbay because we kept seeing good synthesizers sent off as "unrepairable" when all they needed was patience, a schematic and a steady hand. We swap out dried capacitors, hunt for intermittent faults, recalibrate oscillators until they track properly again, and source or rebuild parts that stopped being made decades ago.
We don't try to make old machines sound new. Our job is to make them sound like themselves again, and to make sure they keep working for the next person who plays them.
Patchbay is a three-person studio in Rotterdam dedicated to the repair and restoration of vintage synthesizers. We work on instruments that have been sitting in attics, basements, and rehearsal rooms for decades — the ones that hum when they shouldn't, lose their voice, or refuse to power on at all. Our approach is patient and detail-oriented. We trace faults through aging circuit boards, source period-correct components when possible, and treat every repair as a conversation with the person who built the instrument, and the musicians who played it before it fell silent.
We believe these machines deserve to stay in circulation rather than end up in landfill. Whether it is a Moog, a Juno, or a machine you cannot name, bring it in and we will tell you honestly what it needs.
Specs and numbers
| Claude Opus 5.5 | MiMo v2.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Made in | US | China |
| Released | 22 Sep 2026 | 21 Sep 2026 |
| Price in, per M tokens | $4.00 | $0.14 |
| Price out, per M tokens | $20.00 | $0.28 |
| Context | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Weights | closed | open |
| Hacker News points | 2,737 | 5 |
| Time for the six prompts | 11 min 46 s | 24 min 20 s |
| List price of the six prompts | $1.57 | $0.040 |
MiMo v2.6 Flash was cheaper: $1.53 less at list price, and less on each of the 6 prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 was faster: 12 min 34 s less in total, and faster on 5 of the 6 prompts.
In the recording, Claude Opus 5.5's Breakout game plays; MiMo v2.6 Flash's stopped painting.
Rebuild this screen experiment: Claude Opus 5.5's rebuild matched the screenshot at 89%; MiMo v2.6 Flash was not in it. Tea Garden experiment: Claude Opus 5.5's game passed 5 of 5 checks; MiMo v2.6 Flash was not in it.





