Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5
Ling 3.1 Flash took 75 min 28 s and $0.055 at list price, Claude Opus 5.5 took 11 min 46 s and $1.57 at list price. Ling 3.1 Flash took 6.4× as long, and Claude Opus 5.5 cost 29× as much.
Ling 3.1 Flash
inclusionAI · $0.225/M out · 1 HN pts
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · $20.00/M out · 2,737 HN pts
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has CLI runs here (Claude Code).
Pelican
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Watch
Draw a mechanical wristwatch that shows the current local time, with a sweeping seconds hand and a date window. Make it look expensive.
Landing
Build the landing page for Lumen Cycles, a Copenhagen workshop that builds custom cargo bikes to order. Make it look like a real brand you would trust with 4,000 euros.
Breakout
Make a Breakout game I can play right now with the keyboard or the mouse. Give it several levels, a score and some juice.
Logo
Design a logo for Night Heron, an independent bookshop that only opens after dark.
About
Write the opening of the About us page for Patchbay, a three-person studio in Rotterdam that repairs vintage synthesizers. About 150 words.
Patchbay is a small repair studio in Rotterdam dedicated to keeping vintage synthesizers alive. We are three people — a technician, a historian, and a musician — who believe that the instruments built in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s still have decades of sound left in them, if someone is willing to care for them properly.
We work on everything from early Moogs and Arps to Roland Junos and Oberheim OB-series, handling everything from dead power supplies and leaky batteries to full recaps and voice board restoration. Our workshop is small by design. We take on a limited number of instruments at a time, which means every synth that comes through our door gets our full attention.
Most of our clients are working musicians, collectors, and small studios across Europe, but we also welcome instruments with stories we'd love to hear. If you have a piece of synth history that needs care, we'd be glad to talk.
Patchbay is three people in a narrow workshop near the Maas in Rotterdam. Every day we open up instruments that were built before most of their current owners were born. Some arrive in flight cases and some come wrapped in old bath towels. Most have a story: a Juno that went quiet halfway through a gig, a Minimoog left in someone's attic for thirty years, or a modular system that a previous technician gave up on.
We started Patchbay because we kept seeing good synthesizers sent off as "unrepairable" when all they needed was patience, a schematic and a steady hand. We swap out dried capacitors, hunt for intermittent faults, recalibrate oscillators until they track properly again, and source or rebuild parts that stopped being made decades ago.
We don't try to make old machines sound new. Our job is to make them sound like themselves again, and to make sure they keep working for the next person who plays them.
Specs and numbers
| Ling 3.1 Flash | Claude Opus 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | inclusionAI | Anthropic |
| Made in | China | US |
| Released | 2 Oct 2026 | 22 Sep 2026 |
| Price in, per M tokens | $0.075 | $4.00 |
| Price out, per M tokens | $0.225 | $20.00 |
| Context | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Weights | closed | closed |
| Hacker News points | 1 | 2,737 |
| Time for the six prompts | 75 min 28 s | 11 min 46 s |
| List price of the six prompts | $0.055 | $1.57 |
Ling 3.1 Flash was cheaper: $1.51 less at list price, and less on each of the 6 prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 was faster: 63 min 42 s less in total, and faster on each of the 6 prompts.
In the recording, both Breakout games play.
Rebuild this screen experiment: Claude Opus 5.5's rebuild matched the screenshot at 89%; Ling 3.1 Flash was not in it. Tea Garden experiment: Claude Opus 5.5's game passed 5 of 5 checks; Ling 3.1 Flash was not in it.





