Ling 3.2 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5
Ling 3.2 Flash took 69 min 47 s and was free at list price, Claude Opus 5.5 took 7 min 7 s and $0.94 at list price. Ling 3.2 Flash took 9.8× as long.
Ling 3.2 Flash
inclusionAI · free route
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic · $20.00/M out · 2,737 HN pts
Only Claude Opus 5.5 has CLI runs here (Claude Code).
Pelican
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Watch
Draw a mechanical wristwatch that shows the current local time, with a sweeping seconds hand and a date window. Make it look expensive.
Landing
Build the landing page for Lumen Cycles, a Copenhagen workshop that builds custom cargo bikes to order. Make it look like a real brand you would trust with 4,000 euros.
Logo
Design a logo for Night Heron, an independent bookshop that only opens after dark.
About
Write the opening of the About us page for Patchbay, a three-person studio in Rotterdam that repairs vintage synthesizers. About 150 words.
Patchbay is a three-person repair studio in Rotterdam, devoted to vintage synthesizers. We are two electronics technicians and one former touring musician, and between us we have spent decades around machines that hum, drift and occasionally die on stage. Our bench sits in a quiet unit just off the Maas, where we take apart oscillators, resurrect dead filter circuits, free stuck keys and give tired capacitors somewhere better to be. Some instruments arrive barely alive; others only need a careful clean, a recalibration and someone willing to listen properly. We work slowly, document everything we find, replace only what needs replacing, and protect what makes each synth sound like itself. It is quiet, exact work, and we think it matters. Every repair leaves tested, tuned and ready for another twenty years. If yours has stopped speaking, bring it by; we'd like to hear what it used to say.
Patchbay is three people in a narrow workshop near the Maas in Rotterdam. Every day we open up instruments that were built before most of their current owners were born. Some arrive in flight cases and some come wrapped in old bath towels. Most have a story: a Juno that went quiet halfway through a gig, a Minimoog left in someone's attic for thirty years, or a modular system that a previous technician gave up on.
We started Patchbay because we kept seeing good synthesizers sent off as "unrepairable" when all they needed was patience, a schematic and a steady hand. We swap out dried capacitors, hunt for intermittent faults, recalibrate oscillators until they track properly again, and source or rebuild parts that stopped being made decades ago.
We don't try to make old machines sound new. Our job is to make them sound like themselves again, and to make sure they keep working for the next person who plays them.
Specs and numbers
| Ling 3.2 Flash | Claude Opus 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | inclusionAI | Anthropic |
| Made in | China | US |
| Released | 13 Nov 2026 | 22 Sep 2026 |
| Price in, per M tokens | free route (list $0/M) | $4.00 |
| Price out, per M tokens | free route (list $0/M) | $20.00 |
| Context | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Weights | open | closed |
| Hacker News points | — | 2,737 |
| Time for the five prompts | 69 min 47 s | 7 min 7 s |
| List price of the five prompts | free | $0.94 |
Ling 3.2 Flash was free at list price; Claude Opus 5.5 cost $0.94. Claude Opus 5.5 was faster: 62 min 40 s less in total, and faster on each of the 5 prompts.
Ling 3.2 Flash has no Breakout game: not run yet.
Rebuild this screen experiment: Claude Opus 5.5's rebuild matched the screenshot at 89%; Ling 3.2 Flash was not in it. Tea Garden experiment: Claude Opus 5.5's game passed 5 of 5 checks; Ling 3.2 Flash was not in it.



