Ling 3.2 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Ling 3.2 Flash took 69 min 47 s and was free at list price, Claude Haiku 5.5 took 2 min 22 s and $0.017 at list price. Ling 3.2 Flash took 29× as long.
Ling 3.2 Flash
inclusionAI · free route
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic · $0.50/M out · 1,071 HN pts
Pelican
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Watch
Draw a mechanical wristwatch that shows the current local time, with a sweeping seconds hand and a date window. Make it look expensive.
Landing
Build the landing page for Lumen Cycles, a Copenhagen workshop that builds custom cargo bikes to order. Make it look like a real brand you would trust with 4,000 euros.
Logo
Design a logo for Night Heron, an independent bookshop that only opens after dark.
About
Write the opening of the About us page for Patchbay, a three-person studio in Rotterdam that repairs vintage synthesizers. About 150 words.
Patchbay is a three-person repair studio in Rotterdam, devoted to vintage synthesizers. We are two electronics technicians and one former touring musician, and between us we have spent decades around machines that hum, drift and occasionally die on stage. Our bench sits in a quiet unit just off the Maas, where we take apart oscillators, resurrect dead filter circuits, free stuck keys and give tired capacitors somewhere better to be. Some instruments arrive barely alive; others only need a careful clean, a recalibration and someone willing to listen properly. We work slowly, document everything we find, replace only what needs replacing, and protect what makes each synth sound like itself. It is quiet, exact work, and we think it matters. Every repair leaves tested, tuned and ready for another twenty years. If yours has stopped speaking, bring it by; we'd like to hear what it used to say.
Patchbay is a three-person studio in Rotterdam, and we spend our days inside vintage synthesizers. We are repair technicians first: we open the cases, replace the leaking capacitors, re-tune the oscillators that have drifted out of pitch, and bring back the filters that went silent decades ago. Our bench is crowded with service manuals, spare chips, and a soldering station that has seen more Moog panels than we can count. We started the studio because we kept meeting musicians whose favourite instruments sat unused in cupboards, not because they were broken beyond saving but because nobody nearby knew how to fix them. We still believe most of these machines can be made to sing again, and we would rather spend an afternoon finding the one bad resistor than see another good synth end up in a skip.
Specs and numbers
| Ling 3.2 Flash | Claude Haiku 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | inclusionAI | Anthropic |
| Made in | China | US |
| Released | 13 Nov 2026 | 7 Oct 2026 |
| Price in, per M tokens | free route (list $0/M) | $0.10 |
| Price out, per M tokens | free route (list $0/M) | $0.50 |
| Context | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Weights | open | closed |
| Hacker News points | — | 1,071 |
| Time for the five prompts | 69 min 47 s | 2 min 22 s |
| List price of the five prompts | free | $0.017 |
Ling 3.2 Flash was free at list price; Claude Haiku 5.5 cost $0.017. Claude Haiku 5.5 was faster: 67 min 25 s less in total, and faster on each of the 5 prompts.
Ling 3.2 Flash has no Breakout game: not run yet.



