Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Muse Wonder took 6 min 56 s and $0.93 at list price, GPT-6.1 Sol took 12 min 10 s and $0.37 at list price. GPT-6.1 Sol took 1.8× as long, and Muse Wonder cost 2.5× as much.
Muse Wonder
Meta · $20.00/M out · 682 HN pts
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · $10.00/M out · 1,166 HN pts
Pelican
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Watch
Draw a mechanical wristwatch that shows the current local time, with a sweeping seconds hand and a date window. Make it look expensive.
Landing
Build the landing page for Lumen Cycles, a Copenhagen workshop that builds custom cargo bikes to order. Make it look like a real brand you would trust with 4,000 euros.
Breakout
Make a Breakout game I can play right now with the keyboard or the mouse. Give it several levels, a score and some juice.
Logo
Design a logo for Night Heron, an independent bookshop that only opens after dark.
About
Write the opening of the About us page for Patchbay, a three-person studio in Rotterdam that repairs vintage synthesizers. About 150 words.
Patchbay is a small workshop in Rotterdam where three of us spend our days bringing vintage synthesizers back to life. We repair and restore instruments from the 1960s, 70s, and 80s — Minimoogs with drifting oscillators, Junos with silent choruses, Prophet-5s that have not powered on in decades — tracing faults board by board, replacing tired components, and calibrating each machine until it sounds musical again. We believe these instruments were built to be played, not preserved behind glass, so we work carefully and reversibly wherever possible, documenting every repair and keeping original parts when they can be saved. Musicians, studios, and collectors bring us synths from across Europe, sometimes in flight cases, sometimes in pieces. Whether it needs a full restoration or a single sticky key, we treat it as if it were our own, and we will not send it home until we would happily play it ourselves.
Patchbay is a three-person studio in Rotterdam, keeping vintage synthesizers in working hands. We repair the instruments that have picked up a crackle, lost a voice, drifted out of tune, or stopped making sound altogether.
We like the patient side of repair: tracing a fault, understanding an old circuit, and finding the right fix rather than the quickest workaround. Our aim is to make each instrument dependable without sanding away the character that made someone fall for it in the first place.
Some synths arrive with a clear problem. Others come with a story and a noise that only happens after twenty minutes. Either way, the work starts with listening—to the instrument and to the person who plays it.
We’re a small studio by choice. It keeps us close to the work, and to the musicians who trust us with something they want to keep making music with.
Specs and numbers
| Muse Wonder | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | OpenAI |
| Made in | US | US |
| Released | 12 Oct 2026 | 29 Sep 2026 |
| Price in, per M tokens | $4.00 | $2.00 |
| Price out, per M tokens | $20.00 | $10.00 |
| Context | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Weights | closed | closed |
| Hacker News points | 682 | 1,166 |
| Time for the six prompts | 6 min 56 s | 12 min 10 s |
| List price of the six prompts | $0.93 | $0.37 |
GPT-6.1 Sol was cheaper: $0.57 less at list price, and less on each of the 6 prompts. Muse Wonder was faster: 5 min 14 s less in total, and faster on 4 of the 6 prompts.
In the recording, both Breakout games play.
Rebuild this screen experiment: Muse Wonder's rebuild matched the screenshot at 66%, GPT-6.1 Sol's 97%. Tea Garden experiment: Muse Wonder's game passed 5 of 5 checks, GPT-6.1 Sol's 5 of 5.





