Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1
Ling 3.1 Flash took 75 min 28 s and $0.055 at list price, Claude Fable 5.1 took 16 min 4 s and $3.97 at list price. Ling 3.1 Flash took 4.7× as long, and Claude Fable 5.1 cost 72× as much.
Ling 3.1 Flash
inclusionAI · $0.225/M out · 1 HN pts
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · $50.00/M out · 1,630 HN pts
Only Claude Fable 5.1 has CLI runs here (Claude Code).
Pelican
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Watch
Draw a mechanical wristwatch that shows the current local time, with a sweeping seconds hand and a date window. Make it look expensive.
Landing
Build the landing page for Lumen Cycles, a Copenhagen workshop that builds custom cargo bikes to order. Make it look like a real brand you would trust with 4,000 euros.
Breakout
Make a Breakout game I can play right now with the keyboard or the mouse. Give it several levels, a score and some juice.
Logo
Design a logo for Night Heron, an independent bookshop that only opens after dark.
About
Write the opening of the About us page for Patchbay, a three-person studio in Rotterdam that repairs vintage synthesizers. About 150 words.
Patchbay is a small repair studio in Rotterdam dedicated to keeping vintage synthesizers alive. We are three people — a technician, a historian, and a musician — who believe that the instruments built in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s still have decades of sound left in them, if someone is willing to care for them properly.
We work on everything from early Moogs and Arps to Roland Junos and Oberheim OB-series, handling everything from dead power supplies and leaky batteries to full recaps and voice board restoration. Our workshop is small by design. We take on a limited number of instruments at a time, which means every synth that comes through our door gets our full attention.
Most of our clients are working musicians, collectors, and small studios across Europe, but we also welcome instruments with stories we'd love to hear. If you have a piece of synth history that needs care, we'd be glad to talk.
Patchbay is three people and one workshop in Rotterdam, and we spend our days bringing old synthesizers back to life. Most of what arrives at our bench is somewhere between thirty and fifty years old: a Juno with a dead voice chip, a Minimoog that drifts out of tune the moment the room warms up, a Polysix whose battery has quietly eaten its own circuit board. We know these instruments inside and out because we have had hundreds of them open on the table.
We started Patchbay because we kept meeting musicians who had been told their synth was not worth fixing. We disagree. These machines were built to be serviced, and with the right parts, enough patience, and a good set of schematics, almost any of them can be made to play again. When we hand an instrument back, we want it to sound the way it did the day it left the factory, or better.
Specs and numbers
| Ling 3.1 Flash | Claude Fable 5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | inclusionAI | Anthropic |
| Made in | China | US |
| Released | 2 Oct 2026 | 1 Sep 2026 |
| Price in, per M tokens | $0.075 | $10.00 |
| Price out, per M tokens | $0.225 | $50.00 |
| Context | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Weights | closed | closed |
| Hacker News points | 1 | 1,630 |
| Time for the six prompts | 75 min 28 s | 16 min 4 s |
| List price of the six prompts | $0.055 | $3.97 |
Ling 3.1 Flash was cheaper: $3.92 less at list price, and less on each of the 6 prompts. Claude Fable 5.1 was faster: 59 min 23 s less in total, and faster on 5 of the 6 prompts.
In the recording, Ling 3.1 Flash's Breakout game plays; Claude Fable 5.1's stopped painting.
Rebuild this screen experiment: Claude Fable 5.1's rebuild matched the screenshot at 78%; Ling 3.1 Flash was not in it. Tea Garden experiment: Claude Fable 5.1's game passed 5 of 5 checks; Ling 3.1 Flash was not in it.





