Ling 3.2 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1
Ling 3.2 Flash took 69 min 47 s and was free at list price, Claude Fable 5.1 took 10 min 26 s and $2.55 at list price. Ling 3.2 Flash took 6.7× as long.
Ling 3.2 Flash
inclusionAI · free route
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · $50.00/M out · 1,630 HN pts
Only Claude Fable 5.1 has CLI runs here (Claude Code).
Pelican
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Watch
Draw a mechanical wristwatch that shows the current local time, with a sweeping seconds hand and a date window. Make it look expensive.
Landing
Build the landing page for Lumen Cycles, a Copenhagen workshop that builds custom cargo bikes to order. Make it look like a real brand you would trust with 4,000 euros.
Logo
Design a logo for Night Heron, an independent bookshop that only opens after dark.
About
Write the opening of the About us page for Patchbay, a three-person studio in Rotterdam that repairs vintage synthesizers. About 150 words.
Patchbay is a three-person repair studio in Rotterdam, devoted to vintage synthesizers. We are two electronics technicians and one former touring musician, and between us we have spent decades around machines that hum, drift and occasionally die on stage. Our bench sits in a quiet unit just off the Maas, where we take apart oscillators, resurrect dead filter circuits, free stuck keys and give tired capacitors somewhere better to be. Some instruments arrive barely alive; others only need a careful clean, a recalibration and someone willing to listen properly. We work slowly, document everything we find, replace only what needs replacing, and protect what makes each synth sound like itself. It is quiet, exact work, and we think it matters. Every repair leaves tested, tuned and ready for another twenty years. If yours has stopped speaking, bring it by; we'd like to hear what it used to say.
Patchbay is three people and one workshop in Rotterdam, and we spend our days bringing old synthesizers back to life. Most of what arrives at our bench is somewhere between thirty and fifty years old: a Juno with a dead voice chip, a Minimoog that drifts out of tune the moment the room warms up, a Polysix whose battery has quietly eaten its own circuit board. We know these instruments inside and out because we have had hundreds of them open on the table.
We started Patchbay because we kept meeting musicians who had been told their synth was not worth fixing. We disagree. These machines were built to be serviced, and with the right parts, enough patience, and a good set of schematics, almost any of them can be made to play again. When we hand an instrument back, we want it to sound the way it did the day it left the factory, or better.
Specs and numbers
| Ling 3.2 Flash | Claude Fable 5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | inclusionAI | Anthropic |
| Made in | China | US |
| Released | 13 Nov 2026 | 1 Sep 2026 |
| Price in, per M tokens | free route (list $0/M) | $10.00 |
| Price out, per M tokens | free route (list $0/M) | $50.00 |
| Context | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Weights | open | closed |
| Hacker News points | — | 1,630 |
| Time for the five prompts | 69 min 47 s | 10 min 26 s |
| List price of the five prompts | free | $2.55 |
Ling 3.2 Flash was free at list price; Claude Fable 5.1 cost $2.55. Claude Fable 5.1 was faster: 59 min 21 s less in total, and faster on each of the 5 prompts.
Ling 3.2 Flash has no Breakout game: not run yet.
Rebuild this screen experiment: Claude Fable 5.1's rebuild matched the screenshot at 78%; Ling 3.2 Flash was not in it. Tea Garden experiment: Claude Fable 5.1's game passed 5 of 5 checks; Ling 3.2 Flash was not in it.



