Ling 3.2 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Ling 3.2 Flash took 69 min 47 s and was free at list price, GPT-6.1 Sol took 9 min 43 s and $0.29 at list price. Ling 3.2 Flash took 7.2× as long.
Ling 3.2 Flash
inclusionAI · free route
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · $10.00/M out · 1,166 HN pts
Pelican
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Watch
Draw a mechanical wristwatch that shows the current local time, with a sweeping seconds hand and a date window. Make it look expensive.
Landing
Build the landing page for Lumen Cycles, a Copenhagen workshop that builds custom cargo bikes to order. Make it look like a real brand you would trust with 4,000 euros.
Logo
Design a logo for Night Heron, an independent bookshop that only opens after dark.
About
Write the opening of the About us page for Patchbay, a three-person studio in Rotterdam that repairs vintage synthesizers. About 150 words.
Patchbay is a three-person repair studio in Rotterdam, devoted to vintage synthesizers. We are two electronics technicians and one former touring musician, and between us we have spent decades around machines that hum, drift and occasionally die on stage. Our bench sits in a quiet unit just off the Maas, where we take apart oscillators, resurrect dead filter circuits, free stuck keys and give tired capacitors somewhere better to be. Some instruments arrive barely alive; others only need a careful clean, a recalibration and someone willing to listen properly. We work slowly, document everything we find, replace only what needs replacing, and protect what makes each synth sound like itself. It is quiet, exact work, and we think it matters. Every repair leaves tested, tuned and ready for another twenty years. If yours has stopped speaking, bring it by; we'd like to hear what it used to say.
Patchbay is a three-person studio in Rotterdam, keeping vintage synthesizers in working hands. We repair the instruments that have picked up a crackle, lost a voice, drifted out of tune, or stopped making sound altogether.
We like the patient side of repair: tracing a fault, understanding an old circuit, and finding the right fix rather than the quickest workaround. Our aim is to make each instrument dependable without sanding away the character that made someone fall for it in the first place.
Some synths arrive with a clear problem. Others come with a story and a noise that only happens after twenty minutes. Either way, the work starts with listening—to the instrument and to the person who plays it.
We’re a small studio by choice. It keeps us close to the work, and to the musicians who trust us with something they want to keep making music with.
Specs and numbers
| Ling 3.2 Flash | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | inclusionAI | OpenAI |
| Made in | China | US |
| Released | 13 Nov 2026 | 29 Sep 2026 |
| Price in, per M tokens | free route (list $0/M) | $2.00 |
| Price out, per M tokens | free route (list $0/M) | $10.00 |
| Context | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Weights | open | closed |
| Hacker News points | — | 1,166 |
| Time for the five prompts | 69 min 47 s | 9 min 43 s |
| List price of the five prompts | free | $0.29 |
Ling 3.2 Flash was free at list price; GPT-6.1 Sol cost $0.29. GPT-6.1 Sol was faster: 60 min 4 s less in total, and faster on each of the 5 prompts.
Ling 3.2 Flash has no Breakout game: not run yet.
Rebuild this screen experiment: GPT-6.1 Sol's rebuild matched the screenshot at 97%; Ling 3.2 Flash was not in it. Tea Garden experiment: GPT-6.1 Sol's game passed 5 of 5 checks; Ling 3.2 Flash was not in it.



